<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PR&#8217;s nightmare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/</link>
	<description>About PR, New Media, Technology, Books and stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:34:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pristan</title>
		<link>http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>pristan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>HI richclark, 

you are right about the PR agencies. Somehow, may see the traditional PR and the new media part as separate entities. 

Since I moved from agency to in-house, and have been working with various agencies that claimed to have &quot;new media department&quot; but I noticed that the PR team who are working on my account don&#039;t quite know the new media parts, and the new media team doesn&#039;t quite understand PR strategies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI richclark, </p>
<p>you are right about the PR agencies. Somehow, may see the traditional PR and the new media part as separate entities. </p>
<p>Since I moved from agency to in-house, and have been working with various agencies that claimed to have &#8220;new media department&#8221; but I noticed that the PR team who are working on my account don&#8217;t quite know the new media parts, and the new media team doesn&#8217;t quite understand PR strategies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richclark</title>
		<link>http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-1023</link>
		<dc:creator>richclark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-1023</guid>
		<description>Great post.  Doesn&#039;t this just highlight that social media and PR are interlinked.

Maybe all organisations need to consider is a new way to channel PR strategies.  If they use PR agencies, ensure that they are completely on-game when it comes to social (so many aren&#039;t)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  Doesn&#8217;t this just highlight that social media and PR are interlinked.</p>
<p>Maybe all organisations need to consider is a new way to channel PR strategies.  If they use PR agencies, ensure that they are completely on-game when it comes to social (so many aren&#8217;t)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pristan</title>
		<link>http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>pristan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kevin. I get his email alerts for new post. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kevin. I get his email alerts for new post. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-311</guid>
		<description>Priscilla, you might be interested in what &lt;a href=&quot;http://thepr2.0universe.com/2007/11/27/the-myopia-of-pr-detractors/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Melvin Yuan shared recently...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Priscilla, you might be interested in what <a href="http://thepr2.0universe.com/2007/11/27/the-myopia-of-pr-detractors/" rel="nofollow">Melvin Yuan shared recently&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pristan</title>
		<link>http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>pristan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-285</guid>
		<description>Kevin, very well put. I agree completely. 

Ming Yeow, see you back in Feb?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, very well put. I agree completely. </p>
<p>Ming Yeow, see you back in Feb?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ming Yeow</title>
		<link>http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Ming Yeow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-280</guid>
		<description>hi priscilla! you touched on a topic which is extremely close to my heart, and which is what my new startup is working on. Not exactly PR, but really aiming at solving the relevancy/interest problem that plagues current social networks.

Chat more when i am back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi priscilla! you touched on a topic which is extremely close to my heart, and which is what my new startup is working on. Not exactly PR, but really aiming at solving the relevancy/interest problem that plagues current social networks.</p>
<p>Chat more when i am back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it simply a case of &quot;appropriateness&quot;?

From finding the right tool, to working it just right, no more no less. 

The uninitiated are easily seduced by the new replacing the old, when mainstream media, new media and social media are merely different channels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it simply a case of &#8220;appropriateness&#8221;?</p>
<p>From finding the right tool, to working it just right, no more no less. </p>
<p>The uninitiated are easily seduced by the new replacing the old, when mainstream media, new media and social media are merely different channels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pristan</title>
		<link>http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>pristan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Walter, great points! We have to catch up over coffee soon. 

You read the book &quot;the fall of advertising and the rise of PR&quot; ? Am not surprised to see &quot;the fall of PR and the rise of social media!&quot; soon. heh

Mainstream media is definitely still ruling! Even for big internet/ tech brands, how often are they saying &quot;for PR ROIs, we want to see coverage in Facebook/ so-and so- bloggers&#039; post?&quot; No, in local context, it&#039;ll always be &quot; why isn&#039;t there a ST story???!!!!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter, great points! We have to catch up over coffee soon. </p>
<p>You read the book &#8220;the fall of advertising and the rise of PR&#8221; ? Am not surprised to see &#8220;the fall of PR and the rise of social media!&#8221; soon. heh</p>
<p>Mainstream media is definitely still ruling! Even for big internet/ tech brands, how often are they saying &#8220;for PR ROIs, we want to see coverage in Facebook/ so-and so- bloggers&#8217; post?&#8221; No, in local context, it&#8217;ll always be &#8221; why isn&#8217;t there a ST story???!!!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter</title>
		<link>http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priscillatan.com/2007/11/19/prs-nightmare/#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Bravo bravo!  Well written and I totally agree with you.  While I am as much a purveyor of social media as you are, I also firmly believe that different products/services for different target audiences require different PR approaches.  

From my experience with Yesterday.sg, it is clear that just having a blog/facebook acct/twitter/Jaiku/youtube/whatever isn&#039;t going to save the day if you don&#039;t have:

1) A clear and coherent community engagement strategy

2) Great content that matters to your target groups

3) A strong offline presence to synergize with what you are doing online

4) Customers who will bother to spend time surfing your blog/listening to your podcasts/viewing your youtubes.

We can be so fixated with the tools that we forget about the quality of the content and relationships, which matter most in social media.  And of course, despite what all the doomsday prophets are saying, mainstream media still rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo bravo!  Well written and I totally agree with you.  While I am as much a purveyor of social media as you are, I also firmly believe that different products/services for different target audiences require different PR approaches.  </p>
<p>From my experience with Yesterday.sg, it is clear that just having a blog/facebook acct/twitter/Jaiku/youtube/whatever isn&#8217;t going to save the day if you don&#8217;t have:</p>
<p>1) A clear and coherent community engagement strategy</p>
<p>2) Great content that matters to your target groups</p>
<p>3) A strong offline presence to synergize with what you are doing online</p>
<p>4) Customers who will bother to spend time surfing your blog/listening to your podcasts/viewing your youtubes.</p>
<p>We can be so fixated with the tools that we forget about the quality of the content and relationships, which matter most in social media.  And of course, despite what all the doomsday prophets are saying, mainstream media still rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
